htraetalf.com Website : Earth is Flat Written Backwards HTRAETALF

As Carlos Araujo said, because NASA knows that the earth is flat. Or maybe it’s because Aldiana de Souza bought the website htraetalf.com at DREAMHOST and directed it to NASA. And then the poor ignorant people with digital illiteracy immediately thought it was NASA’s responsibility.

It also works with illuminati. itanimulli.com, registered at https://www.godaddy.com/also redirects to the NSA.

Anyone who believed, even for a second, that this is proof that NASA knows that the earth is flat and that the NSA is the illuminati

It must be because someone, knowing that NASA is absolutely not a flat earther, made this automatic link on the internet, since “htraetalf”, being “Flat Earth” in reverse, would be a denial of the flat earth. It could be that NASA itself did this.

Earth is Flat Written Backwards HTRAETALF

It wouldn’t do any good for these blockheads. They didn’t even believe Captain Kirk. By the way, NASA has a satellite at the Lagrange point continually taking photos and filming the Earth and the Moon, beautiful images, including one of the Moon passing in front of the Earth, but for these guys it’s no use, they’ll say it’s a montage.

Because money doesn’t grow on trees and because that wouldn’t work.

You spend a fortune and send a flat-earther into space, he looks out the spaceship window, sees the Earth as spherical, and…

1. The flat-earther would be convinced, but would be rejected by the other flat-earthers for “selling out to NASA”;
2. the flat-earther would say it was a virtual reality experience, as he had to stay inside a spaceship the entire time.

Some claim that the Earth is flat because they cannot perceive its curvature. At home I did a mathematical calculation to use as an example of perspective. I used as an example a large polyhedron cut in half, like an orange slice. At this point I calculated a polygon based on this polyhedron (which would appear spherical) using the idea of ​​internal angles. I even presented it to a flat-earther, who, unsurprisingly for me, ended up denying my argument (standard in most TPs). I used the calculation of internal angles of a polygon and divided by the number of sides. To get an idea of ​​the number of sides, I used as an example a person 1.80m tall in relation to sea level looking towards the horizon on the beach. The viewing radius, according to some calculations, is approximately 4km. I thought about using the diameter of the viewing circle, which is 8km.

From then on, I calculated the sum of the internal angles using Si=(n-2)x180° , with n being the number of sides of this polygon. Applying the number of sides, we have:

Si=(5000–2)x180°=899640°

I decided to divide this number by the number of sides to obtain the internal angle of each corner, arriving at 899640/5000=179.928°. This number of just over 179.9° is almost 180°, which is mathematically a perfect straight line. If you imagine yourself on one of these sides in a proportional way, you will never notice the curvature with the naked eye. It’s just a matter of mathematically based perspective.

When I presented this perspective example, TP said “math doesn’t prove anything.” For someone who hasn’t had a knowledge base to rely on mathematics, it’s easy to be convinced of anything that doesn’t make sense

Of course, I used an example of someone who was purely ignorant, who had no basic knowledge and was deceived. And here comes the key point in answering his question: the flat Earth hypothesis has existed since before Erastotle, more than 2000 years ago, carried out the oldest experiment to prove the Earth’s spherical shape.

The internet simply became a tool for disseminating this idea, which gained strength precisely with these dishonest people who deceive so many people without a basis of scientific knowledge. Therefore, this flat-earth movement is increasingly evident, which raises some questions:

How do some scientists want to combat this community as united as that of the flat earth if there is no firm unity in the scientific world?

Dishonest TPs realize this and use it to deceive those who are unaware. I even believe that some of these dishonest TPs don’t even believe in the hypothesis they defend, and that they only do it to make money with videos on YouTube.

Why don’t people who believe in conspiracy theories trust science?

As I said, since primary and secondary education it is common to see a gap in scientific education, but the distance between scientists and the population has only increased. Yes, we have books, science websites, documentaries, various means of communication to access knowledge, but this distance brings to mind the hypothesis of a side effect, where people simply are not interested in science. Scientists, for the most part, lock themselves away in their fortresses and only come out to publish an article, publicize research, etc., but they do not speak directly to the population. There is no need to go and speak at schools, take students on excursions and so on. There is no shortage of ideas for the population to have more pleasurable contact with science.

These points lead me to believe that the internet movement is nothing more than a new way that an old anti-scientific movement found to propagate itself.

I hope I didn’t sound too confusing. Strong hug!